Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Art's avatar

As an environmental professional, I was deeply disturbed observing the climategate scandal roughly 15 years ago. What had before just seemed to be the excesses of political activists had morphed into a corruption of science. Then I started noticing that the attendees at environmental conferences started to include people from the financial sector, a phenomenon I had never seen before. Clearly something deeply dishonest but very lucrative to someone was afoot.

Climate issues subsumed every other environmental issue, some of which could have been resolved relatively inexpensively and nearly every scientific paper had to pay homily to climate, even if climate was only distantly related to the subject. For anyone to even suggest that the apocalypse was not imminent and that resources were being diverted from real-time, local problems onto predicted harms decades in the future was a ticket to cancellation.

In the last three years I observed that the phenomenon of climate politics subverting science looked a whole lot like a template for the suppression of open dialogue about Covid and the ham handed, authoritarian response to it. This Substack is fabulous at showing and widening the cracks in the wall of politicized environmental science and policy. Keep up the good work!

Expand full comment
Robert Bryce's avatar

Attaboy, @envmental

We need many more "green shoots of reason and logic" in 2024.

Keep going.

Expand full comment
80 more comments...

No posts